BLOG THE BOOK 1 AND 2

Todays diary,
I called ben Joans computer repair man and made an appointment
for the seventh of Feburary.
He won't be there that week so his technican will handle the job.
I also might get a manual on my Pioneer.
I can get it serviced but it is going to cost me $59 upfront.
Pussy has been eating mince that is good because we don't ever
know what to feed her,but she has been meowing too much.
Mum thinks she might be in pain.
But I don't think so she is OK.
Steve Patrick refunded the $100 I sent him by mistake.
Both guys are named Steve.
So it is going to take a few days for my paypal refund to clear.
Then I can pay Steve Cooper and he should get started on Sensible
girl on Thursday.
That is if he got his money I don't think he willl start until he
gets his hundred dollars.
Josh is still working on Branagan and Flanaggan.And I have told
him I will pay him in two weeks.
I had better be careful as I have to pay for the computer also in
two weeks.
But Joan sais her repair guy is reasonable.
But the question is what does Joan consider reasonable.$
Will it be cheaper than Drews $50.
Drew is a great guy but it looks like he will be replaced by
another guy.
The noone reads my blog I might as well write a book syndrome.
That is the name of this dairy.
I intend to reminse and talk about the past and the future.
How can I talk about the future.
The future of my song Back to the Future with the Chevy Ford
band.
I have asked them to play the songs warming up their instruments.
So people will always hear them first before they go on.
Rawhide is great for warming up instruments.
This machine is really hunky dory.It works 100% and only cost
$20.
The kids will like it much better than a typewriter.
My friend Ralphs kids I mean I might make a gift of it to Hanna
if she is a budding writer.
You just never know if someone is going to be a writer and you
always do.
The nonone ever reads my blog I will write a book syndrome.
That is what Iam talking about.
That is why Iam using a wordprocessor rather than a computer.
There is no accounting for taste.
And maybe there is an accounting for taste.
We has better watch out.!
I won $20 last night and actually I won $35 but I lost $15 back.
If I have sandwhiches for lunch I will be able to pay my RSL
fees.
So I can go to the club in the future.
I will have enough for busfare and my RSL fees.
Fixing the pioneer is a big expense I have to put $59 down.
And that is taken off the repair bill.
And I have to pay a courier to deliver the parcel.
I think I will because the girl said it was up to me.
And it is mum would not do it let alone dad.
But I can pay whatever it costs to get the Pioneer working again.
My theory of the big bang.
Four states of matter in one state and four forces one.
That means state and forces are one thing.
2 STATE+ 2 FORCE= 4 STATE/FORCE.
Now that is an equation really a theory for everything.
We should be able to prove that supercritical non newtonian fluid
has only two states.
And as a result only two forces there we have our equation for
the begining of the universe 2+2=4.
Maybe 2+2=4 is not such a bad equation for the begining.
But what if the maths was always non contradictory.
If it is never 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
Like my book sais.Only Einstein sais the math can be works out as
a non contradiction.
Is Einstein wrong and Stephen Jeffreys right.
That depends on what Stephen Jeffreys really believes.
Does he believe that the maths is a non contradiction and that
creaation began ex-nihilo.
Not out of a phase change from one state of matter to four.
That would produce the energy OK but what about the ID.The
intelligent design.
It is taken for granted.
But without it would there be order in a disorderly universe.
Can we build a bomb based on supercritical non newtonian fluid.?
Since nobel was an exposives manufacturer perhaps he would give
me his prize if I could make an explosive producing a plasma from
supercritical non newtonian fluid.
Then all four forces and four states would be one.
But am I right is finding correspondance between state and force.
No one is sure they ask thier local scientist.
Blacksmith friend.
Blacksmith friend Iam not sure you will ever solve time with my
Godel time machine.
But Godel has a universe which is opposite to our own in which
their are closed time loops.
Maybe it is opposite in being a non contradiction at the
begining.
If that is true then the maths works out in A godel universe for
the big bang.
A unified field theory is a possibility and the opposite is a
black hole in a Godel universe.
The reverse of this maths should give us the big bang in our
universe.
This is enough to keep mathematicians busy for centuries.
Or at least for five minitues.
It should keep them quiet for the scientist babysitters who are
minding the mathematicians making sure they are empirical.
But the baby sitters haven't done a very good job.
My thoery of everything is a universal program.
One that is a superomega 2+2=4 is a superomega when it is used to
get one equation for everything in a theory of maths.
But physics and maths are very similar if you can get one
equation for phsyics you can also get one for maths.
But omega means you can't or does superomega mean you can.
It gets confusing.
Wolframs celular automaton means you don't use maths to get the
rules for everything.
So in a sense it means Omega is right.
You have to go beyond maths to make it an experimental science.
Really these two things are the same.
Dad is really mentally unbalanced he listens to the radio and Tv
all day long.
And whenever I try to talk he tells me to shut up and listen to
the radio.
It has just gotten worse and worse over the years.
It shows what happens when you let habits get to you...
A habit is a force for evil.
Good habits are a force for good.
Like learning to fix watches.It is just too expensive.
And that is the whole trouble there are so many things to buy.
It would be good if everything were all on one kit.
Easy to use.
But it isn't easy and it might not be too hard.
Time will tell the future is what we make it.
If I could fix watches I could have a big house with a Big plasma
TV and a wife to go with it.
You can't have a wife unless you can support her.
That is what Will Robinson said about Sleeping beauty.
I paid Steve Cooper $100 today for Simply Sensible.
He said he would talk to Juli about doing the song.
They don't have any answers because they are not asking any
questions.
Like what would an ex-nihilo theory look like.
How would it differ from the big bang theory.
What if we add billions of years to exnihilo what do we get.
Rubbish that is what everyone might say.
But I don't think so.
Ex-nihilo is a non contradictory begining for the universe the
four states of matter are always four and the forces never become
one.
So the contradiction equation 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE=
1 APPLE/ORANGE is not true.
This arguement against the big bang is so strong mathematically.
That the only recource of the blaphemer is ad hominum arguements
against me.
They find scientific arguements ineffective.
This is because Einstein wanted a non contradictory theory of
everything.
And what we have is a contradictory theory of everything where
opposite particles X and Y are in the same space and the same
time in the same state.
The non contradictory thoery of everything would be creation in
the Godel universe where the maths that is the reverse of our
system could make sense.
This is just a begining for a creation ex-nihilo theory of
everything.
Everything including the expansion of the universe needs to be
taken into account.
Iam getting my computer fixed next pay as well as paying part
payment on two songs.
So money is going to be tight.
I wonder when I will ever have any money to just have a good
time.
Steve Cooper has booked Juli for next Friday.
He has recorded parts of the song Simply Sensible.
Steve Coopers son is in Jumped and Alien Versus Predator 2.
And I asked Steve Cooper if the girl from Dr Phil.
Could record in his Houston Studios and have pizza with the band.
Chevy Ford band.
The future is not ours to see.
But I figure if I have mercy on someone else that is trying to
make it it will water me as well.
One favour deserves another.
And it is by doing people favours who one day will be successful.
That one succeeds yourself.
Look at Kevin Rudd I tried to help him get elected.
He is now helping the homeless my main thing.
But he still refuses to put intelligent design in Australian
schools.
Maybe the unions won't let him.
It really matters to me as much as homelessness.
But how much does it matter to Kevin Rudd that creation is taught
in schools.
One would think it would matter a little to any christian.
Except an evolutionist and then he would want reasons to believe
curriculum taught in schools.
Either way it is the thought that counts remembering God when it
comes to what we teach our kids.
Next pay my major challenge is to give Stephanie Nickel a deposit
of $200 or more for the last stage of our script IN THE SHADOW OF
9/11.
It is a good script so far and Iam hoping Steph can finish it
without ruining the first 60 pages.
It has gone the way that I wanted it to go and it is important to
be true to yourself.
I would like a pair of crocs shoes.
And maybe they will have to wait if I want to pay Stephanie.
Unless I pay half the bill for Broadband this pay and the other
half next pay.
Supercritical non newtonian fluid does that mean 2 STATES+ 2
FORCES= 4 STATE/FORCE.
I think it really does although Iam not certain going from that
to plasma unifes the four states and four forces.
It is the subject of experiment.
And experiment can answer all questions.
Eddington said don't worry if the observations don't mathc your
theory the observations are probably wrong.
This is the opposite to the empirical approach to science.
Maybe you need a philosophy that can be tested by observations.
Maybe if science is not grounded in philosophy it can't work.
Was that what Eddington was trying to say.
For example there were not observations of an expanding universe
in Einsteins time so he modified his theory with the cosmological
constant which he later called his greatest blunder.
The future is ours to see.
And of course it was not Einsteins to see the future.And anyone
who makes up a thoery doesn't know whether it will be right.
But they should believe in it.
And to believe in it it has to add up.
It has to be as sensible as 2+2=4.
Then you can be certain that it is right.
And if it is really really simple then it cannot be wrong.
Yet even simple things can be wrong.
Simple observations of the way things work can be in error.And
observations are never wrong.
So If I base a theory on an observation that entropy reverses
when ice freezes.
then I cannot be wrong when I say entropy reverses for the big
bang.
But it doesn't.
And it has to to explain the order in the universe.My ramblings
juts off the top of my head.
Are as good as mud.
And they might be as clear as mud.
But totally interesting anyway.
And there is nothing unclear about my ramblings.
There is no future for rambling.
And there is a great future for blogs of all kinds.And maybe the
blog will never replace the book.
And it is Blog the book.
That is what this book is one big blog.
And it is exciting to have my starwriter on my desk.
Because writing is a slow process.
And if I leave it in the lounge room I will have a book in no
time.
One that isn't very good.And one that is just fine.
So what kind of a book will it be now.
A book about everything.
About totally anything I find interesting.
And the starwriter makes a great gift for me.
Because I can see what Iam writing.
And it is better than a computer.
It is great for writing my blog.
And what do I want to winge about.
If you are writing a blog you must want to winge about something.
And I do I want to winge about why it is so.
Because there is nothing worse than winging.
And asking why the problem exists in the first place.
is the first step towartds solving it.
So why do indentical particles X and Y exist in the SAME PLACE at
the SAME STATE at the SAME TIME.
I would say that they don't.
If I didn't believe the big bang.
And the big bang means 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1
APPLE/ORANGE is TRUE.
And if it is true identical particles can occupy the SAME SPACE.
Why is it so.?
And that is our problem why does this equation mean something
which cannot be true.
The answer is it does mean two opposites can be one.
But it also means identical particles can be made one.
And maybe both are true.
But to add identical particles you have to split them in 1/3s.
And maybe you only have to take a third of a particle
matematically.
And this is really interesting.A third of a particle
mathematically is a third of a particle.
It will behave just as if you had split the particle three ways.
So there is nothing to stop us putting three identical particles
togther on paper.


And that is a solution to fusion.
If we could do it in reality and not just on paper.
Then we could take three hydrogens and get one hydrogen.
Hydrogen three.
And that isn't it it is a new particle of hydrogen based on three
divided particles.
And maybe it is the answer.
But will never know if we don't ask the question why is it so.?
Why would three particles becoming one.
Generate power.
It is a answer to a prayer.
Because it might be an answer to a hope.
That one can be three.
Because splitting one into three is what three thirds are all
about.
But three into one is exactly the same process.
And it really is not.
It is putting humpty back togther again.
And if a third of a particle can exist at all.
Then it can be joined to another two thirds of a particle.
So we take the particle apart and then we put it back togther
again.
And that is humpty dumpty.
And it is a sound theory.
But putting particles togther in the same place at the same time
when they are identical.
Is plausible.
If we are dealing with forces on a par with the big bang.
Then paricles may disintegrate and reunite all the time.
What is my purpose noting les than nuclear oblivian.And of course
I ahve higher hopes than that for a world on the brink of war.
And it is insane to have high hopes.Ad it might not be insane to
believe that eventually war will be over.
And that nuclear power will replace ordinary power.
And that is exactly what happened.
So it could happen again.
After using the power that is given in anger.
It may never be used again not in anger but in peace.
And everything has it downside.It is the slipppery slope.
And sometimes allowing something does not mean the slippery
slope.
Sometimes things get better and not worse.
And that is the opposite to Murphys law.
And we cannot live our lives by Murphys law or we would always be
afraid.
That is what the law on non contradiction causes in me.
Fear of what it means to have exceptions.
But there have always been exceptions.
and there always will be one exception that is the big bang.
It can never be worked out as Einstein said that it could be with
on contraiction mathematics.
It takes a new kind of math QUANTUM STRANGENESS.
To work out the big bang.
If time can travel backwards and entropy be reversed then the big
bang can make sense.
If four states of matter being one means four forces are also
one.
The energy can be released on a grand scale.
Four particles A B X Y can be four states of identical particles.
and they can be one STATE and the four particles can be in the
SAME POSITION at the SAME TIME.
And this is the key to unlimited energy.
And you don't have to believe me ADOPT A PHYSIST.
That is what Iam doing.
And he will tell me to go back to the drawing board.
But in trying to prove me wrong he will prove me right.
And I will have plenty to talk about.
Because adopting a physics professor for collaboration was the
best move ever.
There is no answer to how much I have to want to be free.
Because if I believe writing is a curse.
Then I have to want to be free.
And everyone believes writing is no curse.
But what about a blessing I have yet to see any blessing from my
writing.
And it is obvious that it is no blessing.
Because it is plain that the fruit is bad.
And yet I continue to make a blog.
Because I hope in vain for something to happen.
That is positive.
And everything seems to be negative.
And all things come to those who wait.
One day I will be happy that I kept writing.
Because I could be afraid of all the possibilities.
Like a poisoned pie.
You can't believe God would make a poisoned pie.
And I do not believe that.
And the truth is I do believe God is the author of a poisoned
pie.
Because everything I believe affects me.And believing God is the
author of a pie that is poisoned.
Really makes it hard for God to reach me.
And it isn't the case.That it is hard for God to reach me.
And it really is true that He is trying hard.
To get me to believe the pie is not poison.
Because if anyone can eat the pie and not be hurt.
Then it is not poison.
But of course I explain the way of 666.
And I explain how to believe otherwise.
And of course I make it very difficult to believe otherwise.
But that is because it is difficult to prove 666 wrong.
With mathematics.
Because it is easy to prove it wrong with logic.
And that is what I will do right now.
I will prove 666 wrong with logic.
It is logical to do the opposite of what Jesus sais.
If Jesus sais 12+12=24 is right then 21+21=42 must be right.
And that is the logic of the blaphemers.
They simply have to choose 42 as there answer rather than six
fours.
If Jesus had said 42 was the answer they would choose 24.
And it is obvious that Jesus did not say anything.And of course
it is all in my mind.And I may have darkenes instead of light.
That is the whole question have I blasphemed the Holy Spirit by
talking about why Einstein is wrong.
And I might have done that if Einstein was God.
And of course he is not.
So I can prove him wrong without proving God wrong.
And maybe I can't prove Einstein wrong without proving God wrong.
Then If Iam really proving God wrong in my book Einstein Proved
Wrong.
Then it is a poisoned pie.
But if the purpose is to prove God right.
Then the pie is not poisoned.
And I don't know if my purpose is to prove God right or the law
of non contradiction wrong.
And that is just it if it is my purpose to prove non
contradiction wrong.
Then Iam proving all truth wrong.
And If I argue the big bang contradicts the law of non
contradiction.
Then I doing God a big favour.
And I might think so.But God doesn't need any favours.
And He would love one.
He would love it if I decided that ex-nihilo creation means
matter was never in the same state at the same time in the same
place.
That opposite particles cannot be in the same state and place at
the same time.
And this would really rot your socks if you were with reasons to
believe.
Because the big bang is mathematically impossible.
Unless we allow the creation equation.
And it is 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
And it is a contradiction according to my enemies.
But if they are right it proves the big bang wrong.
Because that is a good purpose for a creation equation.
But if the big bang is right.
Then a whole new branch of contradictory math must be created to
allow identical particles to exist in the same state at the same
time in teh same place.
And that would not prove the big bang right.
It would mean it is not part of the set of truth.
IT would mean it is a lie.
And that is close to the truth.
Because the thoery that everything was once one.
Cannot be true if the law of non contradiction always holds.
The reason why the pie may be poison.
Is many good christians believe both the law of non contradiction
and the big bang.
And if one is not true then the other will still be true.
And sadly they will choose to believe non contradiction does not
always apply.
That makes my computer program poison.
Because it attempts to unify everything with my equation and
2+2=4.
And maybe 2+2=4 is the real saver.
Becasue the four forces can be four.
And they can if they are two forces plus two forces.
And that is what Iam explaining with non contradiction.
Because if forces are two they are not contradictory.
They are only contradictory when they are one.


Everything cannot be one they way God is one.
And if the equation attempts to make creation the same as the
creator.
Then it is a pot of poison.
But it is not clear in my book that the creation equation is a
means of proving creation cannot be a big bang.
If the big bang is 2+2=4 then it can still have occured.
Only in this way can the law of non contradiction be right.
But what if 2+2=4 is not adequate.
WHat if you can't explain the equations by adding them 2+2=4.
Because if the unviverse was once 2 FORCES+ 2 STATES= 4
FORCE/STATE.
Then all equations should add up 2+2=4.
And Einsetins equatin doesn't.
Even though I have tried hard to prove why it can be 2+2=4.
Scientists would say it is fundamentally not a 2+2=4 equation.
And that is just it if I can come up with a theory of everything
that is 2+2=4.
The Hawking is a cosmic con artist.
And it does not follow from the conclusion.
And it really does follow.
Hawking believes you can prove anything with math.
And it will still be right.
But that is seperating the real world from the math.
And I can prove everything with the math.
I can prove Einsteins unified field theory.
At least in my delusions of grandeur I can prove it.
But I have never looked at the math of Godel.
Yet I claim his theory begins with a non contradictory big bang.
And leads to a contradictory black hole.
And this as good as what Hawking does.
And of course he checks the math first.
BUt I have come with the idea so Hawking can check the math.
If the the big bang is non contradictory in another universe.
That means it is contradictory in ours.
And maybe that is a recipie for disaster.
But time will not go backward in our universe.
And it will at the begining.
That is a new theory that Godel is right for the begining of our
unviverse.
And it sounds good and it was right off the top of my head.
Because it is good enough to loose my head.
Because the math can be understood to prove the big bang wrong.
Because the above should be true if the big bang is a
contradiction.
But if the opposite of a black hole in a Godel universe is non
contradiction maths.
Then that math should prove the big bang right.
But if it does not then it may prove exnihilo.
But exnihilo has never been combined with an old universe.
And if it were combined it would prove science right.
And religion right.

It would prove both wrong.And of course we don't know what it
woud prove.
But maybe we would be better off with a big bang.


Than ex-nihilo that argues evolution is right.
It is hard to argue evolution is wrong if the earth is old.
And that isn't true.
And it might not be the premise that everything exists without
cause.
Is a premise that is inadeqaute.
It is a God of inadequacy.
When evolution is put togther with ID.
Both are an adequate cause.
And they may be if ex-nihilo creation were combined with an old
earth.
But that would an an inadequate explaination of the origin of the
earth.
And only if everything had to be created all at once.
Maybe seven days means it took time for creation to take place.
And that is happened according to the laws of physics chemistry
and biology.
With a helping hand from ID.
Id is an excellent helping hand for evolution.
Without ID evolution cannot explain anything.
But with ID evolution can explain everything.
And that could be a suspect pie.
Because we are saying God lied about the creation of the
universe.
And of course we are not saying that we are saying Lord help us
to explain how you created everything.
Without saying you did it by chance.
And that is the pie of ill repute.
My universal program which gives rise to space and time.
Maybe it is terrific.
To be able to prove order within randomness.
or maybe it is just a way of arguing there is no God.
There has to be order within randomness so mankind will have a
choce whether to have faith or not.
Philosophy and creation science can never approach God.
And they cannot reach God without faith.
That is the four spiritual laws.
And If I were lost I would love them.
But because Iam found I don't regard them highly.
And it is the opposite if I were lost I would not regard the four
spiritual laws highly.
They are too simple an explaination for life the universe and
everything.
And Jesus explaination is 3*4.
Three laws about four spiritual laws.
And they are MAKE NO GRAVEN IMAGE.Because God can be random.
He can be an image that is random.
And God is never happy with graven images.
Graven images can be mathematical equations for God.
And that is exactly it making God one with everything is a graven
image.
And God is one with everything.
And only for the Buddhists.
Every single thing on earth is distinct and in kinds.
And there are kinds of all phenomonon.
And that includes things like states and forces.


They are never one but always kinds.
That means everything has never be one.
Everything has always been at least four states and four kinds of
forces.
That is the four laws for cosmology.
The fact that there are four laws for the universe.
Means there are four laws for everything.
And that might be 12 because there are three laws.
Of four.
And that is the total of all knowledge.
To understand what it means that three times four is equal to 12.
And maybe it just like 42.
Just an answer you give when you don't know.
But God does know.
So the answer he gives is not a contradiction.
And three fours is not contradictory any more than two sixs.
2+2=4 is equal to 12+12=24.
And that is the basis of the early univese.
It is simply not what they say it is.
And there equations are no better than 42.
Because that is actually the answer they are giving.
But am I trusting someone I love.
I believe so.
Someone I love would not poison me.
And If Iam poisoned by someone I love.
Then it my fault for trusting a little bit too much.
You can find the answers in my next book.
And I hope so that the starwriter will get many years of use.
Because it is an excellent tool for writing the truth.
And if I told lies I would say it is perfect.
But it is just a machine that makes it easy to write.
And you just would never get around to writing as much as you
will write on this machine.
The equation for acceleration is intitial speed- final
speed/time.
And it is 2.
Because then you can add Speed= Distance/time.
If you make that two as well.
And then you have an equation for the speed of deceleration.
And exactly what is the speed of the deceleration of light in the
mirror chamber.
If is faster than C.
And it may faster than any speed.
Because light declerates very fast.
The speed of decleration is not as fast as the speed of the
acceleration of light.
And it may be very fast but not quite as fast as that.
Light takes 0 time to acclerate.
And that cannot be true since it proves absolute time.
So it must take a little time to accelerate.
And we can measure extremely small times.
And maybe we can't measure how small the time is for light to
accelerate.
But we can measure the decleration of light.And estimate how fast
it accelerates.
But all of this doesn't make sense because I have added two
equations 2+2=4.
And acceleration and speed are two different things.
But if they are the same.
Then what is speed.?
It is something similar to accleration but not quite the same
thing.
What will happen if we add 1/3 ACCELERATION+ 1/3 SPEED+ 1/3
SPEED= 1 ACCELERATION SPEED.
And that will make everything right.
Making two things one.
And totally everything is wrong when speed and acceleration are
the same thing.
Because Einsetins theory not longer applies to speed and
acceleration togther.
We have a new theory that is what we will say.
Because we will say the speed of decleration is greater than C.
And then E=MCsquared not longer applies to gravity waves.Because
the speed of accleration of gravity waves is greater than the
speed of light.And maybe this makes no sense maybe it still means
gravity has to travel at C.
Then Einstien isn't wrong.
But maybe Einstein needs a better theory.
So he has one.
If Iam Einstein then I have a better theory the speed of
acceleration of light is always going to be greater than the
speed of light.
So acceleration is greater than speed.
And that is a terrific law.
Only accleration can never be expressed as speed.
And of course light travels a distance the size of the universe
when it reflected to infinity.
So time is expressed in light years.
And this is divided by the speed of light.
To get acceleration.
And a similar rule will give us decleration.
But when we add the equations 2+2=4.
We get speed of decleration.
And that means information travels at a speed when it transmitted
on declerating light.
And the speed is greater than C.
And if they would only listen they would have a new operating
system for windows.
Where information travelled at a maximum speed of infinity.
And speed means Boyles law is obsolete.
But the law of too much information means that will never build
the new operating system.
And that is a shame so information revolution means information
overload.
They simply can't keep advancing the speed of information.
Because of C.
Unless they can make speed and decleration of light one.
They can never beat Boyles law.
And you are reading it and you think you understand why Iam
wrong.So email me at aircloud@bigpond.net.au
And tell me why information can never travel faster than light.
It may be that you are right.
That information cannot be transmitted on declerating light
beams.
Or accelerating.
If that is so information must always be limited to C.
So boyles law must always apply.
If you have enjoyed adding newtons laws for speed and
acceleration.
Then you will love adding Einsteins equations for speed and
accleration.
Does Einstein approach an explaination of information sent at
faster than the speed of light.?
And his equations for speed and acceleration added 2+2=4.
Or in 1/3s.
Will give an answer to the problem of time.
Does information travel faster than light without going back in
time.?
At the quantum level it does go back in time.
But information is more than quantum.
It is classical and maybe in classical theory information cannot
go faster than light.
We will succeed where others have failed.
This is always the way to fail because others have failed to
prove Einstein wrong for a reason.
And the reason is information cannot travel faster than light.
But let us suspend disbelief for a moment what If information can
travel faster than light.
The the speed of the deceleration of information is faster than
light.
How do I prove Jeffreys wrong.
By measurement it is not an experiment unless you do your own
measurement.
You have to measure the speed of decleration in the mirror
chamber with 2+2=4.
And you find the answer is a bit like adding 2 FORCE+ 2 STATE= 4
FORCE/STATE.
Maybe the equations are interchangeable.
And of course they are goobledegook.
But the idea of 2+2=4 is the most basic of ideas it is not
goobledegook.
It means two ideas can be combined without contradiction.
But we could add 1/3 SPEED C+ 1/3 DECELEATION C+ 1/3 DECELERATION
C= 1 SPEED/DECLERATION.
No one can measure the decleration of light in the mirros
chamber.
And anyone can it takes a bright mind to do so and some very
powerful computers.
And it only takes a five year old with matlab....


So maybe the speed of decleration of light has not been measured
because scientists have not bothered to measure it.
I keep saying hey measure it.
But they say no they won't.
It is a bit like Bruce Almighty they have free will...
So if they ever choose to believe my book they might measure the
speed of the decleration of light.
And see if they can measure information travelling faster than
light.
In a round about way I have described why EInstein would be wrong
if he was wrong but have only proved him right.
The distance travelled by light when it is reflected ot infinity
approaches zero brilliance at infinity.
But never reaches it.
If light were to reach zero.
The explansion of the universe would be at the speed of light.
This proves Einsetin is right.
Because the expansion of the universe can never exceed the speed
of light.
However the universe can be accelerating faster than C.
And what affect would this have on the zero value for the
distance light travels.?
Superheated supercritical non newtonian fluid.
And it is another state.
And it really might be another state to be boiling.
But it is even more of a new state.
But it is not quite plasma.
If it were possible to change a supercritical non newtonian fluid
to plasma.
It would be four states in one.
And it would in theory.
But perhaps supercritical non newtonian fluid cannot exist as a
plasma.
But if we can imagine that it can.
Then we have four forces unified.
And that is the thoery that unifiying the four forces is simply a
matter of unifying the four states.
And if they are totally indendant then you have to unify the four
forces some other way.
And they don't have to be unified.And they do for Einstein to be
right.
That is why we should try to unify them by unifying the four
states.
Four forces can be two forces when matter is two states.
If this is true it simplifys the idea.
There is a direct relationship between forces and the states of
matter.
Even if there is no direct relationship four forces must be one
in the big bang.
And they must be two.
That is 2 FORCES+ 2 STATES= 4 FORCE/STATES.
And it is probably true that making four one.
Is possible but not in the universe.
Creation exnihilo is the alternative of 2+2=4.
and that is possible that it really could be the big bang.
But if the big bang were not one force and were two.
It would be different.
And the ultimate particle for 2+2=4 is the photon not the gluon.
Since photons can be in the same state and place at the same
time.
So thye ultimate particle we are looking for is not solid light.
It is light in a state between states.
And if atoms are made up of solid photons.
Then that is solid light.
And maybe everything begins with photons.
And that is a wild guess.
But like one of spocks guesses it is better than some peoples
calculations.
And we can test it in the accelerator.
And we most certainly can try to find out if atoms are ultimately
made up of photons.
I like it because it is my thoery.
That is what a six year old would say.
I have to say I like it because it fits the data.
It fits the data from Genesis.
Maybe photons are the binding force of the atoms.
And that should be easy to test.
But sometimes like with strings the ultimate particle cannot be
detected with instruments.
But a photon rather than a string would be a totally different
theory.
Matter must be photon like in the big bang.
And that is totally true.
Matter must behave like photons in a stateless way.A maybe a
photon could vibrate at a frequency.
There I have unified string theory and photon theory for the
first time.
If we could imagine a string of light.
Maybe we would be cooking with plutonium.
And I just don't have the answers.
I could say that or I could speculate.
You might as well have two bob each way.
And that is what a lot of people do.
But I choose a rough horse and put the house on.
That is what Hawking sais to do.
And that is the way he plays science.
He bets on improbability.
But it is a good bet the universe is probably stanger than we
imagine it to be.
E=Mcsquared= 2 H+ 2 H + E= 4 H+E
And H is mass the mass of two hyrdgogen atoms.
And mass is equal to atomic weight for hydrogen.
And dont quote me.
Because it is true Iam certain.
E=mc squared= 2 M+ 2M+ E= 4 M+E.
And this is the test of Einsteins equation can you make
E=MCsquared equal to 2+2=4.
If both equations are equal then fission is equal to fusion.
That means the matter that is lost in fission is equal to energy
produced.
And the amount of matter gained in fusion is equal to the energy.
If they can be equal then Einsetin is right.
Matter can be equal to energy and not just mass.
The equations do not equal.
Is what you might say.
You might say E=MCsquared can never be expressed as 2+2=4 because
C cannot be 2.
And if fission can never equal fusion for energy produced and
more is produced by fusion.
The Einstein is wrong about equivalence.
There are two transformations of matter to energy and they are
both not equal to each other.
And that is just balderdash.
And maybe it really isn't because maybe energy and mass are not
equal to energy and mass.
And that is rubbish.
But the possibility that a new energy can be derived from four
states of matter being one.
And foru forces being one.
May mean the fusion and fission are two different things.
And of course they are a hydrogen bomb is not a putonium bomb.
And they are both plutonium bombs.
But it depends on how you phrase a question to the answer that
you get.
And I will bet they will prove Einstein right.
That 2+2=4 can be E=MCsquared.
And that fisson and fusion can be one.
That is it I really don't have anything else to talk about.
And I have decleration.
And I have explained that fully.
And decleration is newtons equation.
For acceleration reversed.
And it might not even be the same equation.
But if we add Newtons equation for decleration to Newtons
equation for speed.
We get the speed of decleration.
And it is equal to Pi squared multiplied 186,000 m/s squared.
And there is no reason that instantaenous doesn't take a little
time.
Pi squared multiplied by 186,000 squared is the fastest speed we
can imagine.
And it maybe the limit for deceleration.
Nothing can decelerate faster than light.
And light can.
Light can declerate faster than light.
So what is the point.
We can transmit information on declerating light.
And maybe we cannot use declerating light for information.
But if we can the speed of the information will be faster than C.
And we be travelling between two mirrors an infinite distance.
The distance is virtual.
And it is more than that it is a physical distance measured by
the loss of energy of light.
And maybe it is a simulator for the real world where light
travels a finite distance.
But you can't round off infinity.
And you really can make finity rational.
Because infinity is always rational.And it never is.
That is the whole point.
If an infinite distance is a rational distance time is absolute.
And if time is absolute anything can travel faster than light.
And only information can.
And of course I have talked about all this before.
So I must be finished.
And there always comes a point where the work is finished.
And maybe I want to finish with four forces thatare one and four
states that are one.
That is a good place to finish.
Because you have you choice of believing the big bang or
exnihilo.
And it on the basis of the test for truth.
And if the test for truth is wrong then the big bang is right.
But if the test for truth is not wrong that it happened
differenty to what they say.
We can say that it must be non contradictory to be a sound
theory.
And that is all we can say since ex-nihilo is not really a
theory.
If it were a theory we could compare it to the big bang and find
one right and the other wrong.
But maybe they are both right and the big bang mathematics must
be non contradictory.
Then 2+2=4 must be right for forces and states.
Because that is non contradictory.
But 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE is
something the scientists do not agree about.
If it is the equation for the big bang.
Then it fails the truth test.
And if it is the equation for ex-nihilo then it doesn't fail the
truth test because something out of nothing is a contradiction.
In terms.
And that is what the contradiction is all about it is
acontradcition of terms.
Terms like space time and state and place.
Particles can exist in the same place even if they are identical.
And they cannot exist in the same time and state.
And I have said this before but it has become the total sum of
all knowledge.
And it might be just that I might know myself that I will choose
something else if God sais 2+2=4.
SO if the truth proves 2+2=4.
I would choose to believe the other equation.
But the truth sais the other equation is right and not 2+2=4.
And maybe that is a lie.
Because arguing against 2+2=4 isn't logical.
And that is the whole point of my books.
You can have a 2+2=4 theory of everything.
One that does add up.
But you cannot have a contradictory theory of everything.
And of course you can.
People disagree about whether the law of non contradiction is
true.
And they will always disagree.
But I should agree that the evidence is in favour of the law.
And I have not looked at the evidence.
And that is what I must do.
Before deciding the big bang is false.
I must be sure the law always holds in every circumstance.
That there are no exceptions.
And there ar eno laws like that.


Even gravity can have an exception.
SO the big bang is an exception to a law that holds true
otherwise.
That is if this equation is right 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3
ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
The non contradictory equation is 2 APPLE+ 2 ORANGE= 4
APPLE/ORANGE.
This could work for the big bang or ex-nihilo.
The maths is simple non contradiction maths.
So the theory has to agree with this law to be valid.
And no one will agree with that.
The hope that I have is that everyone will enjoy what I have
done.And that is because I have saved the starwriter one more
time.
So I can finish what I have started.
And make a dos file.
Because this starwriter can make a dos disc that can save dos
files.
And then I can open them.
And maybe I can open them with XP.
Then I can put them on a blog.
And everyone will say what a great blog.
And nobody ever sais that.
A blog is a blog that is my philosophy.
And it is not very good because there are blogs and there are
blogs.
And it is a great blog.
That is my conclusion and now I will make the dos file.